Bulgaria, Byzantine conquest of
968 CE to 1018 CE
From ca.
970 until 1018, a series of conflicts between the Bulgarian Empire and the Byzantine Empire leadsto the gradual conquest of Bulgaria by the Byzantines, who thus reestablished their control over the entire Balkan peninsula for the first time since the 7th-century Slavic invasions.
The struggle begins with the incorporation of eastern Bulgaria after the Rus'–Byzantine War of 970–971.
Bulgarian resistance is led by the Cometopuli brothers, who, based in the unconquered western regions of the Bulgarian Empire, lead it until its fall under Byzantine rule in 1018 and its end.
As the Byzantine-Bulgarian relations deteriorate by the end of the 960s, the Eastern Roman Empire pays the Kievan prince Sviatoslav to attack Bulgaria.
The unexpected collapse of Bulgaria and Siatoslav's ambitions to seize Constantinople catch the Eastern Roman Empire off-guard but they manage to pull back the Kievan armies and occupy eastern Bulgaria, including the capital, Preslav, in 971.
Emperor Boris II is captured and taken to Constantinople where he abdicates and the Byzantine Emperor John I Tzimiskes announces the annexation of Bulgaria, even though the Eastern Roman Empire only controls Eastern Bulgaria at this time, the lands to the west remaining under Bulgarian control.
The four brothers David, Moses, Aron and Samuel of the Cometopuli dynasty rule in the free territories and in 976 launch a major offensive against the Byzantines to regain the lost lands.
Soon the youngest brother Samuel takes the whole authority following the deaths of his three eldest brothers.Samuel proves to be a successful general, inflicting a major defeat on the Byzantine army commanded by Basil II at the Gates of Trajan and retaking northeastern Bulgaria.
His successful campaigns expand the Bulgarian borders into Thessaly and Epirus and in 998 he conquers the principality of Duklja.
In 997, Samuel is proclaimed Emperor of Bulgaria after the death of the legitimate ruler, Roman.By the end of the millennium, the fortunes of war turn in favor of the Byzantines.
The Byzantines under Basil II, a successful general and experienced soldier, slowly get the upper hand and from 1001 start to seize a number of important areas and towns.
The Bulgarians are unable to stop the annual Byzantine campaigns, which devastate the country.
In 1014, the Byzantines win the decisive battle of Kleidion and Samuel dies a few weeks later.
Tsar Samuel's reign is followed by the short reigns of his son Gavril Radomir and his nephew Ivan Vladislav.
After the death of Ivan Vladislav in 1018, there is no legitimate heir to the throne of Bulgaria and since the Eastern Roman Emperor offera very favorable terms to the Bulgarian nobility, most them choose to surrender.
All local lords who surrender are transferred either to Constantinople or to Anatolia and most of them are later assimilated into the Byzantine society.
Bulgaria loses its independence and remains subject to Byzantium for more than a century and a half, until 1185.
Its western part is transformed into one of the many Byzantine provinces, which is ruled by nominees of the Empeire.
With the collapse of the first Bulgarian state, the Bulgarian church falls under the domination of Greek ecclesiastics who take control of the see of Ohrid and attempt to replace the Bulgarian Slavic liturgy with a Greek liturgy.
Subject
Related Events
Showing 10 events out of 74 total
The Komnenian restoration describes the military, financial and territorial recovery of the East Roman, or Byzantine, Empire under the Komnenian dynasty, from the accession in 1081 of Alexios I Komnenos, to the death in 1180 of Manuel I Komnenos.
The Komnenian restoration is also closely linked to the establishment of the Komnenian imperial army.
Southeast Europe (964 – 1107 CE): Byzantine Resurgence, Bulgarian Integration, and Adriatic–Danubian Corridors
Geographic and Environmental Context
Southeast Europe in this age stretched from Thrace and the Lower Danube through Macedonia and the Morava–Vardar axis to the Adriatic littoral and Dalmatian islands, encompassing nearly all Bulgaria (except the southwest), Romania and Moldova, northeastern Serbia, northeastern Croatia, extreme northeastern Bosnia, and Greece outside Thrace (Attica, Boeotia, Peloponnese, Epirus).
Core lowlands—Wallachian Plain, Lower Danube, Dobruja, Thracian basins—fed populous centers; Balkan passes (Shipka, Varbitsa), the Carpathian Gates, and the Via Militaris tied Belgrade–Niš–Sofia–Adrianople–Constantinople. To the west, the Via Egnatia linked Dyrrhachium (Durrës) with Thessaloniki, while Adriatic island ports (Zadar, Split, Trogir, Kotor, Ragusa) connected to Italy and the Aegean. Black Sea harbors (Varna, Constanţa) and Danube crossings remained strategic for trade and war.
Climate and Environmental Shifts
The Medieval Warm Period (c. 950–1250) lengthened growing seasons in Thrace and the Danube plain, boosting wheat, barley, and vine production. Flood pulses on the Danube and Maritsa set transport calendars. On the steppe margin, drought swings intensified pressures from Pecheneg and later Cuman nomads, shaping frontier policy and campaigning rhythms.
Societies and Political Developments
Bulgarian Decline and Absorption (10th–early 11th c.)
After Peter I (r. 927–969), Bulgaria faced internal strain and external shocks. Sviatoslav of Rus’ (968–971) seized Preslav, prompting John I Tzimiskes to intervene, defeat Sviatoslav, and annex eastern Bulgaria (971). Resistance shifted west under the Cometopuli; Samuel (r. 997–1014) forged a powerful Ohrid-centered empire. Basil II “Bulgar-Slayer” (r. 976–1025) dismantled it via relentless campaigns (notably Kleidion, 1014); by 1018, Bulgaria was fully integrated into the Byzantine system.
Byzantine Resurgence and Administration
The Macedonian dynasty consolidated the Balkans after 1018, reorganizing conquered lands into themes and reestablishing imperial garrisons and bishoprics from Thrace to the Danube marches. In Greece (outside Thrace)—Attica, Boeotia, the Peloponnese, and Epirus—imperial fiscal and judicial structures stabilized agrarian estates and port cities; rising aristocracies (proto-Komnenian milieu) gained regional weight.
Steppe Pressures and Frontier Politics
The Pechenegs dominated the Lower Danube steppe through the late 10th–11th centuries, raiding imperial and former Bulgarian lands; the empire alternated tribute, alliances, and force—culminating in decisive defeat of the Pechenegs with Cuman support (e.g., Levounion, 1091). Thereafter the Cumans (Polovtsians) became the chief nomadic threat along the Danube and into Wallachia and Moldova.
Western Alignments: Croatia, Serbia, Dalmatia
Croatia preserved kingship but, after dynastic ebb, entered a personal union with Hungary (1102), while its coastal communes bargained with Venice. Serbian principalities (Raška, Zeta) oscillated between imperial suzerainty and local assertion; Vukan’s line advanced late in the period. Dalmatian communes—Zadar, Split, Trogir, Kotor, Ragusa—codified statutes, expanded harbors, and played Byzantium, Hungary, and Venice against one another to preserve autonomy and commerce. Inland, Transylvania developed under Hungarian expansion after 1000, shaping northern Danubian balances.
Economy and Trade
Agrarian Core and Fiscal Integration
In Thrace and the Danube valley, grain, vines, and stock-raising thrived. After 1018, Byzantine praktika registered Bulgar peasantry into imperial tax law, channeling surplus to Adrianople, Thessaloniki, and Constantinople.
Corridors and Markets
-
Danube artery: moved wax, honey, furs, grain, slaves between Rus’/Hungary and Constantinople.
-
Via Militaris: imperial armies and caravans supplied inland garrisons and markets.
-
Via Egnatia: fed Dyrrhachium and Thessaloniki, bridging Adriatic and Aegean.
-
Black Sea ports: Varna, Constanţa connected Balkan produce to Byzantine and Rus’ circuits.
-
Adriatic: Venetian convoys knit Dalmatia to Apulia and Ancona, re-exporting Balkan metals (Bosnian/Serbian silver, iron) and salt (e.g., Pag).
Coinage: Byzantine nomismata and copper issues circulated widely; communal credit and notarial practices matured on the Adriatic.
Subsistence and Technology
Fortification & Arms
Byzantium rebuilt Preslav, fortified Sofia, Skopje, Adrianople, and strengthened Danube palisades. Imperial forces relied on cataphract cavalry and thematic infantry; Bulgarian levies served within imperial formations. Pecheneg/Cuman warfare emphasized horse archery and deep raids.
Rural/Maritime Infrastructures
Stone citadels multiplied in coastal and upland nodes; shipyards produced galleys and cogs for Adriatic convoys; inland estates improved presses, mills, and viticultural terraces.
Movement and Interaction Corridors
-
Danube crossings—Ruse, Silistra, Vidin—were pivotal gates for steppe incursions and imperial counter-marches.
-
Carpathian passes opened Magyar/Hungarian access into Transylvania and the lower Danube.
-
Morava–Vardar and Drina–Sava channels linked inland Balkans to Aegean and Central Europe.
-
Adriatic sea-lanes connected Dalmatia to Venice and Italian markets; Black Sea shipping tied ports to Rus’ and the capital.
Belief and Symbolism
Orthodoxy and Slavic Literacy
Orthodox Christianity, consolidated in Bulgaria under Boris and Simeon, was integrated into the Byzantine patriarchal orbit after 1018. Basil II confirmed the Ohrid Archbishopric’s autonomy, preserving Slavic liturgy and Cyrillic script; scriptoria at Ohrid and Preslav continued hagiography and law-text production.
Bogomilism
A dualist critique of hierarchy spread in 10th–11th centuries, embedding dissent within Balkan society and later influencing heretical currents westward.
Relic Cults and Icons
In Greek and Macedonian lands, icons, relics, and monastic networks reinforced imperial legitimacy and localized sanctity; along the Adriatic, Latin rites coexisted with Orthodox practice, especially in the communes.
Adaptation and Resilience
-
Administrative absorption: Byzantine themes stabilized taxation, justice, and military service in newly integrated Bulgaria.
-
Nomad diplomacy: tribute, alliance, and selective recruitment of Pecheneg/Cuman auxiliaries turned steppe pressures into tools of imperial statecraft.
-
Communal governance: Dalmatian statutes and consulates lowered merchant risk and secured harbor revenues despite great-power rivalries.
-
Cultural continuity: the Ohrid settlement safeguarded Slavic ecclesiastical autonomy and literacy under imperial rule.
Long-Term Significance
By 1107 CE, Southeast Europe had been reshaped into a Byzantine-led but polycentric landscape:
-
Bulgaria—politically integrated into the empire—retained Slavic identity and ecclesiastical autonomy at Ohrid, ensuring cultural survival.
-
Byzantium held Thrace and the Danube frontier, yet constant steppe raids taxed imperial resources even amid the Komnenian recovery.
-
Pecheneg collapse and Cuman ascendancy redefined the northern threat; Hungary advanced in Transylvania, shifting power north of the Danube.
-
Croatia–Hungary alignment (1102), Serbian consolidation, and Dalmatian communal strength set the stage for 12th-century realignments—Venetian maritime assertion, Komnenian strategies, and the eventual rise of the Second Bulgarian Empire.
This age fixed the region’s Orthodox Christian character, embedded Cyrillic literacy, and hardened the Byzantine–steppe frontier while keeping the Adriatic–Danubian–Aegean corridors open—foundations that would structure Balkan politics and commerce for the next century.
Eastern Southeast Europe (964 – 1107 CE): Bulgarian Decline, Byzantine Resurgence, and Steppe Pressures
Geographic and Environmental Context
Eastern Southeast Europe includes Turkey-in-Europe (Thrace), northeastern Greece (Thrace-in-Greece), nearly all of Bulgaria (except its southwestern portion), modern-day Romania and Moldova, northeastern Serbia, northeastern Croatia, and extreme northeastern Bosnia and Herzegovina.
-
Core lowlands: the Lower Danube, Wallachian Plain, and Dobruja coast.
-
Mountain corridors: Balkan passes (Shipka, Varbitsa), the Carpathian Gates into Transylvania, and the Via Militaris linking Belgrade–Niš–Sofia–Adrianople–Constantinople.
-
The Black Sea ports (Varna, Constanţa) and Danube crossings remained vital for trade and war.
Climate and Environmental Shifts
-
The Medieval Warm Period (c. 950–1250) brought longer growing seasons and greater agricultural surpluses in the Danube plain and Thrace.
-
Stable monsoonal rainfall boosted viticulture and wheat production, though steppe drought cycles intensified nomadic incursions.
-
River floods on the Danube and Maritsa structured transport calendars.
Societies and Political Developments
-
First Bulgarian Empire:
-
After Peter I (r. 927–969), internal weakness and external pressures mounted.
-
Rus’ prince Sviatoslav invaded Bulgaria (968–971), capturing Preslav; Byzantine emperor John I Tzimiskes (r. 969–976) intervened, defeating Sviatoslav and annexing eastern Bulgaria (971).
-
Bulgarian resistance persisted in the western Balkans under the Cometopuli brothers; Samuel of Bulgaria (r. 997–1014) built a strong empire from Ohrid, challenging Byzantium across the Danube and Adriatic.
-
Basil II “Bulgar-Slayer” (r. 976–1025) waged relentless wars, culminating in the Battle of Kleidion (1014); by 1018, Bulgaria was fully absorbed into the Byzantine Empire.
-
-
Byzantine Resurgence:
-
The Macedonian dynasty (Basil II, Constantine VIII) secured the Balkans after 1018, establishing themes (administrative districts) in Bulgaria and along the Danube.
-
Constantinople reasserted direct control over Thrace, Adrianople, and the Danubian marches, founding bishoprics and garrisons.
-
-
Steppe Nomads:
-
Pechenegs dominated the Lower Danube steppe in the late 10th–11th centuries, raiding Byzantine and Bulgarian lands.
-
Byzantines suffered major defeats (e.g., Battle of Levounion, 1091) before defeating the Pechenegs with Cuman aid.
-
Cumans (Polovtsians) succeeded them as the principal nomads, raiding the Danube frontier by the late 11th century.
-
-
Romania/Moldova (north of the Danube):
-
Slavic–Romance populations persisted under shifting suzerainties (Bulgarian, Byzantine, Pecheneg).
-
Autonomous principalities in Transylvania developed under Hungarian expansion after 1000.
-
-
Northeastern Serbia / Croatia / Bosnia frontiers:
-
Tributary to Bulgaria, Byzantium, or Hungary in shifting intervals; local župans (chieftains) leveraged Danube–Sava junctions for trade and tribute.
-
Economy and Trade
-
Agriculture: wheat, barley, oats, millet, and vines thrived in Thrace and the Danube valley; stock raising continued in mountain margins.
-
Byzantine land system: after conquest of Bulgaria (1018), imperial fiscal registers (praktika) integrated Bulgar peasants into Byzantine tax law.
-
Trade corridors:
-
Danube linked Rus’, Hungary, and the Balkans to Constantinople.
-
Via Militaris carried imperial armies and caravans.
-
Black Sea ports funneled wax, honey, grain, and slaves southward.
-
-
Coinage: Byzantine nomismata circulated widely; regional markets expanded around Preslav, Adrianople, and Skopje.
Subsistence and Technology
-
Fortifications: Byzantine rebuilt Preslav and fortified Sofia, Skopje, and Adrianople; Danube palisades defended ferries.
-
Military systems: Byzantine cataphract cavalry and thematic infantry dominated post-1018; Bulgarians contributed levies. Steppe nomads relied on horse archery and deep raids.
-
Literacy and scripts: Bulgarian monasteries sustained Cyrillic culture even under Byzantine control; scriptoria at Ohrid and Preslav produced hagiographies and law codes.
Movement and Interaction Corridors
-
Danube crossings: Ruse, Silistra, and Vidin remained contested gateways for Pecheneg and Cuman incursions.
-
Via Militaris tied Constantinople with Belgrade, essential for imperial supply.
-
Carpathian passes opened Magyar access into Transylvania and the Danube plain.
-
Black Sea shipping connected ports to Rus’ merchants and Byzantine markets.
Belief and Symbolism
-
Orthodox Christianity:
-
Consolidated in Bulgaria under Boris and Simeon, then integrated into the Byzantine patriarchate after 1018.
-
Ohrid Archbishopric (granted autonomy by Basil II) preserved Slavic liturgy and Cyrillic texts.
-
-
Bogomilism: Dualist heresy spread in 10th–11th centuries, critiquing wealth and hierarchy, enduring into Balkan medieval society.
-
Byzantine Orthodoxy in Thrace and Macedonia reinforced Constantinople’s legitimacy; icons, relics, and churches marked the landscape.
Adaptation and Resilience
-
Imperial absorption: Byzantine themes stabilized taxation and law in conquered Bulgaria.
-
Nomad diplomacy: Byzantines alternated tribute, alliances, and military campaigns to manage Pechenegs and Cumans.
-
Cultural resilience: Slavic literacy and ecclesiastical autonomy at Ohrid preserved Bulgarian identity under Byzantine rule.
-
Military adaptation: recruitment of Pecheneg and Cuman auxiliaries allowed Byzantium to redirect steppe threats against rivals.
Long-Term Significance
By 1107 CE, Eastern Southeast Europe had been reshaped:
-
Bulgaria was integrated into the Byzantine system, though Slavic identity and the Ohrid Archbishopric ensured cultural survival.
-
Byzantium controlled Thrace and the Danube frontier, though constant steppe raids drained resources.
-
Pecheneg collapse and Cuman rise altered the steppe balance.
-
Hungary extended into Transylvania, shifting power north of the Danube.
This age defined the region’s Orthodox Christian character, embedded Cyrillic literacy, and hardened the Byzantine–steppe frontier dynamics that would endure until the Komnenian revival and the Second Bulgarian Empire in the late 12th century.
Western Southeast Europe (964 – 1107 CE): Basil II’s Balkans, Croatian–Hungarian Ties, and Communal Dalmatia
Geographic and Environmental Context
Western Southeast Europe includes Greece (outside Thrace), Albania, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Kosovo, most of Bosnia, southwestern Serbia, most of Croatia, and Slovenia.
-
Coastal lowlands and islands along the Adriatic (Dalmatia, the Ionian isles) met the Dinaric and Pindus mountains’ karst and upland pastures.
-
Interior corridors—Morava–Vardar, Drina–Sava, and the Via Egnatia from Dyrrachium (Durres) to Thessaloniki—linked the Aegean and Adriatic to the central Balkans.
-
River valleys and Mediterranean basins of Attica, Boeotia, Peloponnese, and Epiros anchored Byzantine agrarian themes.
Climate and Environmental Shifts
-
Warm conditions persisted; viticulture and herding thrived along coast-and-upland belts; river ice-free seasons lengthened shipping cycles.
Societies and Political Developments
-
Byzantium under Basil II (r. 976–1025) dismantled the First Bulgarian Empire (1018), restoring imperial control across Macedonia, Kosovo, and Greece outside Thrace; the catepanates and themes stabilized taxation and law.
-
Croatia remained a kingdom but, after dynastic ebb, entered a personal union with Hungary (1102), while coastal communes negotiated with Venice.
-
Serbian principalities (Raška, Zeta) oscillated between Byzantine and local autonomy; Vukan’s line rose late in the period.
-
Dalmatian communes—Zadar, Split, Trogir, Kotor, Ragusa—balanced Byzantine, Venetian, and Hungarian pressures, codifying statutes and expanding harbors.
-
Epirus and Achaea (within this Greece definition) remained Byzantine; local aristocracies accrued weight in the Komnenian ascent on our period’s horizon.
Economy and Trade
-
Silver and iron from inland Bosnia/Serbia moved to Dalmatia; salt pans (e.g., Pag) underwrote fiscal systems.
-
Adriatic convoys—often Venetian—linked Dalmatia to Apulia, Ancona, and Constantinople; Via Egnatia fed Dyrrhachium and inland markets.
Subsistence and Technology
-
Stone fortifications proliferated (coastal walls, inland strongholds); shipyards built cogs and galleys; notarial records standardized credit.
Movement and Interaction Corridors
-
Adriatic lanes: Venice–Dalmatia–Apulia.
-
Vardar–Morava axis integrated Skopje and Niš with Aegean and Danubian worlds.
-
Sava–Drava tied Croatia/Slovenia to Central Europe.
Belief and Symbolism
-
Orthodox monasteries (e.g., Ohrid as an ecclesiastical hub) flourished; Latin mendicants expanded in Dalmatia.
-
Relic cults and processions legitimized communal and princely authority.
Adaptation and Resilience
-
Triangular diplomacy—Byzantine, Hungarian, Venetian—kept corridors open.
-
Communal statutes/consulates lowered risk for merchants.
Long-Term Significance
By 1107, Byzantine administration was restored inland; Croatia–Hungary alignment, Serbian consolidation, and Dalmatian communal strength set the stage for 12th-century transformations.
Jewish Khazaria thrives until the beginning of the tenth century, when the Kievan Rus' finally succeed in crushing Khazar power.
The campaigns of Russian prince Sviatoslav I of Kiev precipitate the collapse of two great powers of Eastern Europe—Khazaria and the First Bulgarian Empire—and make Kievan Rus' the largest state in Europe.
Sviatoslav's invasion of Bulgaria refers to a conflict beginning in 967/968 and ending in 971, carried out in the eastern Balkans and involving the Kievan Rus', Bulgaria, and the East Roman Empire.
Constantinople instigates the Rus' ruler to attack Bulgaria, leading to the collapse of the Bulgarian state and the occupation of much of the country by the Rus'.
The ensuing direct military confrontation between the Rus' and Constantinople ends with an imperial victory.
A series of conflicts between the Bulgarian Empire and the East Roman, or Byzantine, Empire from around 970 until 1018 will lead to the gradual conquest of Bulgaria by Constantinople’s forces, which will thus reestablish Greek control over the entire Balkan peninsula for the first time since the seventh-century Slavic invasions.
The struggle begins with the incorporation of eastern Bulgaria after the Rus'–Byzantine War of 970–971.
Emperor Nikephoros sends to Sviatoslav his agent, Kalokyros, in 967 or 968 with the task of talking Sviatoslav into assisting Constantinople in a war against Bulgaria.
Sviatoslav is paid fifteen thousand pounds of gold and sets sail with an army of fifty thousand men, including thousands of Pecheneg mercenaries.
According to the Russian Primary Chronicle, while Sviatoslav was pursuing this campaign against the First Bulgarian Empire, the Pechenegs (in all probability, bribed by Nikephoros) invade Rus and besiege his capital of Kiev.
While the besieged suffer from hunger and thirst, Sviatoslav's general Pretich deploys his druzhina, his personal guard, on the opposite (left) bank of the Dnieper, not daring to cross the river against the larger Pecheneg force.
Sviatoslav's mother Olga of Kiev (who is in Kiev together with all of Sviatoslav's sons), reduced to extremes, contemplates surrender, if Pretich does not relieve the siege within one day.
She is anxious to send word about her plans to Pretich.
At last, a boy fluent in the Pecheneg language volunteers to venture from the city and urge Pretich to action.
Pretending to be a Pecheneg, he goes about their camp, as if searching for a lost horse.
When he attempts to swim across the Dnieper, the Pechenegs discover his subterfuge and start shooting at him, but to no avail.
When the boy reaches the opposite bank and informs Pretich about the desperate condition of the Kievans, the general decides to make a sally in order to evacuate Sviatoslav's family from the city, for fear of his sovereign's anger.
Early in the morning, Pretich and his troops embark on boats across the Dnieper, making great noise with their trumpets.
The besieged start cheering, and Olga ventures out of the city towards the river.
The Pechenegs, thinking that Sviatoslav is returning with his great army, lifts the siege.
The Pecheneg leader then decides to confer with Pretich and asks him whether he is Sviatoslav.
Pretich admits that he is only a general but warns the Pecheneg ruler that his unit is a vanguard of Sviatoslav's approaching army.
As a sign of his peaceful disposition, the Pecheneg ruler shakes hands with Pretich and exchanges his own horse, sword and arrows for Pretich's armor.
As soon as the Pechenegs retreat, Olga sends a letter to Sviatoslav reproaching him for his neglect of the family and people.
Upon receiving the message, Sviatoslav speedily returns to Kiev and thoroughly defeats the Pechenegs, who are still threatening the city from the south.
The Magyars had from the 940s begun repeatedly to launch pillage raids in the Bulgarian Empire.
Emperor Peter I was unable to stop them and as Constantinople is unwilling to send any help he had finally allied with the Magyars and given the save passage through Bulgaria to attack imperial Thrace.
In 968, Constantinople’s Emperor Nikephoros II Phokas pays the Kievan knyaz Sviatoslav Igorevich to attack Bulgaria in response to the alliance between the Bulgarian emperor Peter I and the Magyars.
Sviatoslav Igorevich gathers sixty thousand troops and starts his campaign in the early spring of 968.
He meets the Bulgarians, who are only thirty thousand strong, near Silistra.
The battle continues the whole day and until dark the Bulgarians seemed to have overwhelmed the Kievans, but, elated by Sviatoslav's personal example, the latter are victorious due to their still larger army.
The Bulgarians retreat to the Silistra fortress and withstand the following siege.
The Rus' forces continue their victorious campaign and though they fail to take Silistra, they seize eighty other fortresses.
Sviatoslav is eventually forced to return to Kiev after Bulgarian diplomacy inspires the Pechenegs to besiege his capital.
Sviatoslav declares his intention of establishing a Russo-Bulgarian empire with its capital at Pereyaslavets (now Perejaslav-Chmel'nickij) on the Danube River.
Transferring his capital here in 969, …
…Sviatoslav designates Vladimir, his youngest son by his housekeeper Malusha, as ruler of Novgorod the Great, but …