Frederick II's Invasion of Lorraine and the Burning of Nancy (1218 CE)

In 1218, Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II swiftly counterattacked Duke Theobald I of Lorraine, who had recently retaken Rosheim and ravaged Alsace. In retaliation, Frederick invaded Lorraine, striking directly at its capital, Nancy, which he captured and burned. This decisive response was part of Frederick’s broader campaign to assert imperial control over rebellious vassals in the Holy Roman Empire.

---

The Context of the Conflict

• Theobald I of Lorraine had challenged Frederick II’s authority by siding with Erard de Brienne in the War of Succession of Champagne and by attacking Alsace.
• In response, Frederick launched a punitive campaign, asserting his power over defiant German lords.

---

Frederick’s Invasion of Lorraine

• Frederick led an imperial army into Lorraine, advancing swiftly to Nancy, the duchy’s capital.
• Upon capturing the city, he ordered it to be burned, sending a clear message of imperial dominance.
• The destruction of Nancy weakened Theobald’s ability to resist, crippling his power base.

---

Consequences of the Attack on Nancy

• Theobald I suffered a major setback, losing his strongest fortress and administrative center.
• Frederick II reaffirmed his authority in Lorraine, demonstrating his capacity to suppress rebellious vassals.
• The attack on Nancy became a turning point in the regional power struggle, as it forced Theobald to reconsider his resistance to the emperor.

Frederick II’s invasion of Lorraine and the burning of Nancy in 1218 underscored his determination to maintain imperial control, crushing opposition among the German nobility and punishing those who defied his rule.

 

The Death of Theobald I of Lorraine and the Turmoil of His Succession (1220 CE)

Theobald I, Duke of Lorraine, never recovered the lands and prestige he lost following his defeat and capture by Emperor Frederick II in 1218. His imprisonment and forced concessions significantly weakened his rule, and he died in February 1220, leaving Lorraine in a precarious state.

---

Theobald’s Marriage and Lack of Heirs

• In 1206, Theobald married Gertrude of Dagsburg, the only child and heir of Albert II, Count of Dagsburg and Metz.
• Their marriage produced no children, meaning there was no direct heir to his title.
• His death created a succession crisis, as power now passed to his brother, Matthias II of Lorraine.

---

Gertrude’s Controversial Second Marriage (May 1220)

• Just three months after Theobald’s death, Gertrude remarried—this time to his former rival, Theobald IV of Champagne, who was only nineteen years old.
• The marriage was highly controversial, as it was arranged without the approval of Emperor Frederick II, who opposed the union.
• Frederick II likely saw the marriage as a political threat, as it strengthened Champagne’s position in Lorraine and increased the influence of the Capetian-aligned nobility in the empire.

---

Consequences of Theobald I’s Death and Gertrude’s Remarriage

1. Matthias II Becomes Duke of Lorraine

   • Matthias inherited a weakened duchy, still recovering from Frederick II’s occupation and intervention.
   • His rule would be overshadowed by external pressures from both the Holy Roman Emperor and French-aligned nobility.

2. Gertrude’s Marriage to Theobald IV of Champagne Deepens Political Tensions

   • Frederick II’s opposition to the marriage set the stage for further imperial interference in Lorraine and Champagne.
   • Theobald IV of Champagne gained influence in the region, complicating relations between the French and the Holy Roman Empire.

The death of Theobald I in 1220 marked the end of his troubled rule and set off a chain of political conflicts in Lorraine, Champagne, and the Holy Roman Empire, influencing the balance of power between France and the empire.

Charles the Bold Captures Nancy (November 30, 1475)

On November 30, 1475, Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy, secured a significant victory by seizing Nancy, the strategic and historic capital of the Duchy of Lorraine. Charles's conquest represented a critical step toward realizing his ambitious geopolitical objective: connecting his Burgundian heartlands with the prosperous Low Countries by controlling the strategically pivotal Lorraine region.

Historical and Strategic Importance of Nancy

Founded around 1050 by Gerard, Duke of Lorraine, the town of Nanciacum (Nancy) evolved from a modest fortified settlement into a significant administrative and political center. After being destroyed in 1218 during the War of Succession of Champagne and subsequently conquered by Emperor Frederick II, Nancy was rebuilt in stone over subsequent centuries, reflecting its growing strategic importance as the capital of the Duchy of Lorraine. Its geographical position—midway between Burgundy and the Low Countries—made control of Nancy essential to Charles’s overarching territorial ambitions.

Charles’s Military and Political Success

Charles's capture of Nancy in 1475 marked one of his few major successes during the turbulent years of the Burgundian Wars. By securing this vital stronghold, he temporarily succeeded in linking his fragmented territories, fulfilling a long-held strategic goal. The seizure of Nancy also dramatically elevated Charles’s prestige, enhancing Burgundian influence and reaffirming his authority across his extensive but disparate domains.

Economic and Cultural Consequences

Nancy’s capture had immediate economic implications. Control over Lorraine allowed Burgundy enhanced access to major trade routes connecting Northern Europe with southern and central territories, briefly expanding Burgundy’s commercial influence and reinforcing the economic foundations of Charles’s envisioned middle kingdom.

Culturally, Charles’s temporary control over Nancy introduced Burgundian artistic and administrative influences into the region, integrating Lorraine more closely into the cultural orbit of the prosperous Burgundian Netherlands.

Diplomatic Context and the Coming Storm

However, this success proved short-lived. Charles’s aggressive actions in Lorraine intensified local resentment, alienated regional rulers, and deepened existing opposition among neighbors, notably the Swiss Confederation, French king Louis XI, and other adversaries. These enemies quickly coalesced into a potent alliance that would soon undermine Charles’s position.

Long-Term Significance

Charles’s triumph at Nancy in 1475 was ultimately overshadowed by the catastrophic events that followed. Within two years, his control of the city would collapse spectacularly. The reconquest of Nancy by Duke René II of Lorraine and his allies in January 1477, culminating in Charles’s own death during the battle, ended Burgundian ambitions decisively.

Thus, the capture of Nancy in 1475 represented a fleeting high-water mark in Charles’s career, highlighting the transient nature of military success when unsupported by diplomatic strategy. Its subsequent loss illustrated the severe vulnerabilities underlying Burgundian power, signaling the definitive end of Burgundy’s brief ascendancy and significantly shaping the political landscape of late medieval Atlantic West Europe.

The Loss of Nancy and Charles the Bold’s Final Campaign (October 6, 1476–January 1477)

On October 6, 1476, Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy, suffered a critical strategic setback when his forces lost control of the pivotal city of Nancy, capital of the Duchy of Lorraine, to René II of Lorraine. This loss threatened Charles’s entire geopolitical vision—cutting off the crucial territorial link between his Burgundian heartlands in the south and his prosperous northern domains in Flanders and the Low Countries.

Strategic Context: Nancy’s Importance

The city of Nancy was of paramount strategic importance to Charles’s ambitious goal of establishing a unified Burgundian state, stretching continuously from Burgundy to the Low Countries. Losing Nancy jeopardized the coherence of his extensive territorial holdings, isolating key regions from effective control and communication. Recognizing the city’s essential strategic role, Charles immediately resolved to reclaim it, even as the harsh winter approached.

Charles’s Desperate Winter Campaign

Determined to reverse the loss, Charles swiftly assembled a new army, pressing forward despite adverse weather conditions. His troops reached the walls of Nancy in the bitter cold of December 1476, undertaking a brutal siege amid severe winter conditions. This campaign was both Charles’s final gamble and testament to his stubborn resolve: unwilling or unable to abandon his territorial aspirations, he staked everything on the desperate effort to retake the city.

Military and Diplomatic Challenges

Charles’s winter siege was fraught with difficulties. His troops suffered greatly from cold, hunger, and low morale, and the logistical challenges severely weakened his military position. Meanwhile, René II of Lorraine had skillfully assembled reinforcements, notably securing vital support from the powerful Swiss Confederation and other regional allies hostile to Burgundy. By early January 1477, the Burgundian forces were dangerously overstretched, demoralized, and isolated.

Long-Term Consequences and Significance

Charles’s determination to retake Nancy directly set the stage for the catastrophic defeat awaiting him. On January 5, 1477, René’s allied forces decisively attacked Charles’s weakened army in the Battle of Nancy, delivering a devastating blow. Charles himself was killed, dramatically ending Burgundian ambitions and permanently transforming the geopolitical landscape of Atlantic West Europe.

The loss of Nancy and Charles’s subsequent defeat profoundly impacted European history. Burgundy, stripped of its ducal leadership, fragmented: France reclaimed the original Duchy of Burgundy, while Charles’s daughter Mary of Burgundy retained the Low Countries and Franche-Comté, territories that subsequently passed to the Habsburg dynasty through marriage.

Thus, the loss and desperate attempt to retake Nancy represented a critical turning point, highlighting both the vulnerabilities and ultimate collapse of Burgundian ambitions and reshaping the balance of power in late medieval Europe.

The Battle of Nancy and the Death of Charles the Bold (January 5, 1477)

On January 5, 1477, the fate of the Duke of Burgundy, Charles the Bold, was sealed decisively at the Battle of Nancy. Reduced by harsh winter conditions to only a few thousand exhausted men, Charles faced a vastly superior alliance composed of the forces of René II of Lorraine and the formidable Swiss Confederation, who had come to relieve the besieged city. The battle, a culmination of years of strategic miscalculations and diplomatic isolation, ended catastrophically for Burgundy, marking the dramatic collapse of Charles’s ambitious political and military aspirations.

The Decisive Engagement

The Burgundian forces, already weakened by severe cold, hunger, and attrition during the preceding siege, were swiftly encircled by the coalition forces. Charles’s army was overwhelmed, suffering devastating losses. In the ensuing chaotic retreat, Charles himself perished. His body, abandoned on the frozen battlefield, was discovered several days later, half-submerged and frozen in the icy waters of a nearby stream, stripped of clothing and grotesquely disfigured.

Discovery and Identification of Charles’s Remains

Charles’s body had been subjected to extreme violence: his skull cleft by a halberd blow, lances lodged deeply in his abdomen and loins, and his face mutilated beyond recognition by scavenging animals. The identification of Charles’s corpse was possible only through the meticulous observation of his personal physician, who recognized distinguishing features—Charles’s unusually long fingernails and distinctive battle scars, accumulated over a lifetime of military campaigns.

Burial and Symbolic End to Burgundian Ambition

Initially, René II respectfully ordered Charles’s battered remains interred within the ducal church at Nancy. This burial symbolically underscored the finality of Burgundy’s defeat and the restoration of Lorraine’s independence. Charles’s death effectively ended the Burgundian defiance against the French monarchy, extinguishing the vision of a unified, autonomous middle kingdom.

Political and Territorial Consequences

Charles’s demise and the destruction of his army at Nancy had profound and lasting implications for European geopolitics. Burgundy’s expansive and ambitious territorial domain fractured rapidly. The original Duchy of Burgundy reverted swiftly to direct royal control under Louis XI of France, while Charles’s heiress, his daughter Mary of Burgundy, retained authority only over the Low Countries and the Franche-Comté. These territories subsequently passed through Mary’s marriage to Austrian Archduke Maximilian of Habsburg, laying foundations for the enduring Habsburg dominance in European affairs.

Cultural and Historical Significance

Charles’s dramatic fall marked a defining moment in late medieval Atlantic West Europe. It signaled the decisive shift from feudal fragmentation and ducal autonomy toward centralized, national monarchies. His catastrophic defeat at Nancy vividly illustrated the consequences of overambitious territorial expansion without sufficient diplomatic and strategic flexibility, leaving a lasting impression on political and military thought across Europe.

Long-Term Legacy

The violent end of Charles the Bold symbolized the limits of late medieval territorial ambition, precipitating the decline of feudal territorial states and the rise of more centralized, modern European states. The dissolution of Burgundy following Nancy reshaped European alliances and set the stage for centuries of rivalry, notably between France and the Habsburgs, fundamentally influencing Europe's historical trajectory into the early modern era.

Lorraine, after after the War of the Polish Succession, had been  part of an agreement in 1737 between France, the House of Habsburg and the Lorraine House of Vaudémont: The Duchy had been given to Stanisław Leszczyński, the former king of Poland and father-in-law to King Louis XV of France, who, despite French support, had lost out to a candidate backed by Russia and Austria in the War of the Polish Succession.

The Lorraine duke Francis Stephen, betrothed to the Emperor's daughter Archduchess Maria Theresa, had been compensated with the Grand Duchy of Tuscany, where the last Medici ruler had recently died without issue.

France also had promised to support Maria Theresa as heir to the Habsburg possessions under the Pragmatic Sanction of 1713.

Leszczyński had received Lorraine with the understanding that it will fall to the French crown on his death.

The title of Duke of Lorraine is of course given to Stanisław, but also retained by Francis Stephen, and it figures prominently in the titles of his successors (as a non-claimant family name), the House of Habsburg-Lorraine.

When Stanisław dies on February 23, 1766, Lorraine is annexed by France and reorganized as a province by the French government.

Louis Majorelle uses flowing, organic forms in his furniture.

The Majorelle firm's factory, designed by famous École de Nancy architect Lucien Weissenburger, is located at 6, rue du Vieil-Aître in the western part of Nancy.

In the 1880s Majorelle turned out pastiches of Louis XV furniture styles, which he exhibited in 1894 at the Exposition d'Art Décoratif et Industriel [Exposition of Decorative and Industrial Art] in Nancy, but the influence of the glass- and furniture-maker Emile Gallé had inspired him to take his production in new directions.

Beginning in the 1890s, Majorelle's furniture, embellished with inlays, take their inspiration from nature: stems of plants, waterlily leaves, tendrils, dragonflies.

The glass created by celebrated French designer Émile Gallé, a pioneer in technical innovations, becomes internationally known and imitated.

Reflecting the prevailing interest in Japanese art, it contributes largely to the free, asymmetric naturalism and symbolistic overtones of Art Nouveau.

Gallé employs wheel cutting, acid etching, casing (i.e., layers of various glass), and special effects such as metallic foils and air bubbles, calling his experiments marqueterie de verre ("marquetry of glass").

At Nancy he leads the revival of craftsmanship and the subsequent dissemination of crafted glass by way of mass production.

Currently at the height of its productivity, his workshop employs nearly three hundred associates.

The fifty-three-year-old master attracts numerous artisans, including the Art Nouveau glassmaker Eugène Rousseau.

Émile Gallé is made first president of the École de Nancy (The School at Nancy, Provincial Alliance of Art Industries).

His furniture designs, based on the Rococo period, continue the French tradition of emphasizing constructive points organically (e.g., corners of armoires finished in the shape of stalks or tree branches) and employing inlay and carving that are essentially floral in style.

Perhaps his most characteristic concept is his meubles parlants ("talking furniture"), which incorporates in its decoration inlaid quotations from leading contemporary Symbolist authors such as Maurice Maeterlinck and Paul Verlaine.

Both his glass and furniture are signed, sometimes most imaginatively.

He collaborates with many colleagues, most notably the French artist, cabinetmaker, furniture designer, and ironworker Louis Majorelle, who is one of the leading exponents of the Art Nouveau style.

Louis Majorelle's catalogs from 1900 on show a tremendous output: suites of furniture for individual rooms, furniture using botanical motifs or other stylistic themes, and specific pieces whose prices range according to custom-ordered materials.

Majorelle's style incorporates a modified flowing line with polished woods, highlighted by Art Nouveau bronze mounts in the eighteenth-century tradition.

 the son of a cabinetmaker, was trained as a painter and went in 1877 to the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris, where he studied under Jean-François Millet.

After his father's death in 1879, he returned to Nancy to manage the family workshop.

Concentrating on the design of furniture, Majorelle moved from eighteenth-century reproductions to the developing style of Art Nouveau and began (to produce works conceived in that style.

While still adhering to the quality of handcraftsmanship, Majorelle maintains a modern workshop that incorporates both machine- and hand-labor in wood, marquetry, bronze, cabinetry, and sculpture.

Thus, he increases production and decreases price, an administrative achievement that accounts for his enormous success.