Childsburgh, the Orange County, North Carolina county…
December 1756 CE
Subjects
Regions
Northern North America
View →Subregions
Northeastern North America
View →Related Events
No active filters.
Showing 10 events out of 26815 total
The Presbyterian Synods in Philadelphia and New York City create the Corporation for Relief of Poor and Distressed Widows and Children of Presbyterian Ministers in 1759.
The Presbyterian Synods in Philadelphia and New York City create the Corporation for Relief of Poor and Distressed Widows and Children of Presbyterian Ministers in 1759.
The Presbyterian Synods in Philadelphia and New York City create the Corporation for Relief of Poor and Distressed Widows and Children of Presbyterian Ministers in 1759.
The Presbyterian Synods in Philadelphia and New York City create the Corporation for Relief of Poor and Distressed Widows and Children of Presbyterian Ministers in 1759.
Northeast Asia (1756–1767 CE)
Russian Expansion, Indigenous Encounters, and Economic Consolidation
From 1756 to 1767, the Russian presence in Northeast Asia continued to expand significantly, driven primarily by the maritime fur trade and further exploration. The profitability of the fur industry encouraged intensified Russian efforts in the region, notably along the Aleutian Islands and throughout the Kamchatka Peninsula.
The Russian settlement of Okhotsk, despite its challenging location and poor harbor conditions, remained the essential maritime gateway connecting inland Siberia with the North Pacific fur trade. Russian traders continued to gather substantial quantities of pelts—primarily sea otter, arctic fox, and fur seal—which were then transported inland and sold in the Chinese markets via the Mongolian border town of Kyakhta.
This era saw increased interaction—often exploitative or conflictual—with local indigenous communities, including the Koryaks, Chukchi, and Itelmens. Indigenous peoples faced demands for yasak (tribute) and were frequently coerced or violently compelled into participating in the fur trade, resulting in significant cultural disruptions and ecological consequences due to overhunting.
In response to escalating competition and logistical challenges, Russian authorities and private traders improved maritime infrastructure, fortified coastal settlements, and enhanced local resource extraction methods. However, Okhotsk’s limitations—scarce arable land, a short growing season, and severe weather—continued to impose substantial difficulties, necessitating the importation of supplies and provisions.
Despite these persistent hardships, the period from 1756 to 1767 consolidated Russia’s territorial claims in Northeast Asia, established firmer administrative control, and deepened its involvement in lucrative trans-Pacific commerce. These developments would shape the geopolitical and economic landscapes of Northeast Asia well into subsequent periods.
Russian fur companies expand into North America along the Aleutian Islands in the early 1760s reaching the Fox Islands and ...
...the Alaska Peninsula in the early 1760s.
British shipping dominates the opium trade out of Calcutta to China.
The annual amount of Indian-grown opium imported into China is about 1,000 chests in 1767.
The Company does not carry the opium itself but, because of the Chinese ban, farms it out to country traders, private traders licensed by the company to take goods from India to China.
The country traders sell the opium to smugglers along the Chinese coast.
The gold and silver the traders receive from these sales are then turned over to the Company.
In China, the company uses the gold and silver it receives to purchase goods that can be sold profitably in England.
The European empires are gradual expanding across the world, as European states develop economies built on maritime trade.
European trading posts have expanded into territorial control in nearby India and on the islands that are now Indonesia.
The Qing response, successful for a time, is in 1756 to establish the Canton System, which restricts maritime trade to this city and gives monopoly trading rights to private Chinese merchants.
The British East India Company and the Dutch East India Company had long before been granted similar monopoly rights by their governments.