England had taken no real part in…
June 1190 CE
England had taken no real part in the first two crusades.
Richard, unlike Philip II of France, has only one ambition, to lead the crusade prompted by Saladin's capture of Jerusalem in 1187.
He has no conception of planning for the future of the English monarchy and puts up everything for sale to buy arms for the crusade.
Yet Richard had not become king to preside over the dismemberment of the Angevin empire.
He has broken with Philip and does not neglect Angevin defenses on the Continent.
Open war is averted only because Philip has also taken the cross.
Richard dips deep into his father's treasure and sells sheriffdoms and other offices.
Richard makes some final arrangements on the continent.
He reconfirms his father's appointment of William Fitz Ralph to the important post of seneschal of Normandy.
In Anjou, Stephen of Tours is replaced as seneschal and temporarily imprisoned for fiscal mismanagement.
Payn de Rochefort, an Angevin knight, is elevated to the post of seneschal of Anjou.
In Poitou, the ex-provost of Benon, Peter Bertin, is made seneschal, and finally, in Gascony, the household official Helie de La Celle is picked for the seneschalship there.
After repositioning the part of his army he left behind to guard his French possessions, Richard finally sets out on the crusade in summer 1190. (His delay is criticized by troubadours such as Bertran de Born.)
He appoints as regents Hugh de Puiset, Bishop of Durham, and William de Mandeville, third Earl of Essex—who soon died and is replaced by Richard's chancellor William Longchamp.
Richard's brother John is not satisfied by this decision and starts scheming against William.
When Richard is raising funds for his crusade, he is said to declare, "I would have sold London if I could find a buyer." (Gillingham, John (2002) [1999], Richard I, London: Yale University Press)