The Amboina survivors’ story has caused an…
December 1623 CE
The Amboina survivors’ story has caused an uproar in England.
The directors of the EIC ask that the English government demand reparations from the VOC and exemplary punishment of the Amboina judges from the Dutch government.
According to the English ambassador Sir Dudley Carleton, the version of events as he presents it, also caused much anger at the VOC in Dutch government circles.
Soon, however, the VOC come up with its version of events which (not surprisingly) contradicts the English version in essential respects.
Thereupon the States-General not unreasonably propose a joint Anglo-Dutch commission of inquiry to establish the facts, which suggestion is rejected by the English as too time-consuming.
As the Dutch are loath to execute the culprits summarily, as the English would prefer, the States-General commissions an inquiry by delegated judges from the highest courts in the Republic to investigate the matter.
The Amboina judges are recalled from the East Indies and put under house arrest.
The trial does not progress speedily, however, because the court of inquiry wishes to cross-examine the English witnesses.
The English government balks at this demand, because it feels it cannot compel the witnesses to travel to the Republic.
Besides, as the English base their case on the incompetence of the court to try employees of the EIC (according to the English interpretation of the Treaty of Defense), the executions are ipso facto illegal in the English view, and therefore constitute a judicial murder.
This contention can be decided without an examination of the witnesses.
The Dutch, however, maintain that the court at Amboina had been competent, and therefore concentrate their inquiry on possible misconduct of the judges.