Pomponazzi had argued specifically in his De…
1525 CE
Pomponazzi had argued specifically in his De immortalitate animae that Aquinas and Aristotle clash over the question of the immortality of the soul.
While Pomponazzi himself does not follow Aristotle in this respect, he argues that Aristotle very clearly argues for the absolute mortality of the soul, with only limited features of immortality.
He is not the first to make this claim, and appears to have been influenced by the Greek commentator on Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias.
He further claims that the immortality of the soul cannot be determined through reason, and thus must be left to the powers of God.
Pomponazzi argues that, since the scriptures reveal that God has made the soul immortal, we too can accept as true the immortality of the soul and thereby go beyond the limits of reason.
The work has given rise to a storm of controversy between the orthodox Thomists of the Catholic Church, the Averroists headed by Agostino Nifo, and the so-called Alexandrist School.
The treatise had been burned at Venice, and Pomponazzi himself runs serious risk of death at the hands of the Catholics.
Two pamphlets had followed, the Apologia and the Defensorium, wherein he explains his paradoxical position as Catholic and philosophic materialist.
His last two treatises, the De incantationibus and the De fato, will be posthumously published in an edition of his works printed at Basel.
Pomponazzi declared his adherence to the Catholic faith, and despite the controversy over his initial work, it has not been condemned by the Church.
Again it is established that the principle that religion and philosophy, faith and knowledge, may be diametrically opposed and yet coexist for the same thinker.
This curious paradox he exemplifies in the De incantatione, where he sums up against the existence of demons and spirits on the basis of the Aristotelian theory of the cosmos, and, as a believing Christian, asserts his faith in their existence.
In this work he insists emphatically upon the orderly sequence of nature, cause and effect.
They grow to maturity and then decay; so religions have their day and succumb.
Even Christianity, he adds (with the proviso that he is speaking as a philosopher) is showing indications of decline.