The Historical Record of the So-Called Shroud…
1354 CE
The Historical Record of the So-Called Shroud of Turin: Before and After 1390
The history of the Shroud of Turin can be divided into two periods:
- Before 1390, which is heavily debated among historians.
- From 1390 onward, when clear historical documentation emerges.
The Uncertain Early History (Before 1390)
-
Some scholars, such as Ian Wilson, have proposed that the Shroud was the Image of Edessa, a relic venerated in the Byzantine world.
-
However, scholars such as Averil Cameron argue that the history of the Image of Edessa is murky, and there is no firm evidence that it was ever a burial cloth or contained an image of Christ.
-
The Pray Codex (c. 1192–1195) is sometimes cited as evidence of an earlier shroud, but:
- The illustration in the codex shows crosses and an interlocking step pyramid pattern.
- No image of Jesus is present.
- The text makes no mention of a miraculous shroud.
- Some historians interpret it as depicting a rectangular tombstone rather than a burial cloth.
-
There are reports of burial shrouds of Jesus being venerated in various locations before the fourteenth century, but none can be definitively linked to the Shroud of Turin.
The First Certain Historical Records (1353–1390)
- The earliest certain mention of a shroud bearing an image of a crucified man appears in Lirey, France, between 1353 and 1357.
- This shroud was in the possession of Geoffroi de Charny, a French knight who died at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356.
- However, it is unclear whether this shroud is the same as the one in Turin today.
Bishop Pierre d’Arcis’ 1390 Memorandum
- In 1390, Bishop Pierre d'Arcis wrote a memorandum to Antipope Clement VII, stating that:
- The shroud was a forgery.
- The artist who created it had confessed to producing the relic.
- This is the first clear, undeniable historical record of the shroud, and it attests to controversy surrounding its authenticity from the start.
Uncertain Origins and Disputed Claims
-
Some historians believe the shroud was once owned by the Byzantine emperors and was looted from Constantinople in 1204 during the Fourth Crusade.
-
However, there is no firm historical evidence linking the Shroud of Turin to any relic in Byzantium, Edessa, or earlier Christian traditions.
-
The shroud’s origin remains highly debated, with claims of forgery attributed to artists born a century apart, and some accounts even stating that the Lirey shroud was created by a confessed forger and murderer.
Conclusion: The Historical Uncertainty of the Shroud
- The first indisputable record of the Shroud of Turin appears in 1390, when it was denounced as a forgery by a bishop.
- Any earlier connections to other relics, such as the Image of Edessa or the shrouds venerated in Constantinople, remain speculative.
- The Lirey shroud (1353–1357) might be the same as the Turin shroud, but its exact origins remain uncertain, with conflicting historical claims and accusations of forgery.
The Shroud of Turin’s early history is filled with conjecture, and its authenticity has been questioned since the very first written records.